§ 36-20-4. Review of rules -- Criteria.  


Latest version.
  •      The committee shall review and evaluate submissions of court rules or proposals for court rules and may review existing court rules, based on the following criteria:
    (1) whether or not they are authorized by the state constitution or by statute;
    (2) whether or not those authorized by statute comply with legislative intent;
    (3) whether or not they are in conflict with existing statute or govern the same policy as articulated in statute;
    (4) whether or not they are primarily substantive or procedural in nature;
    (5) whether or not they infringe upon the powers of the executive or legislative branch of government;
    (6) their impact on affected persons;
    (7) their purpose or the reason for the change;
    (8) the anticipated cost or savings to:
    (a) the state budget;
    (b) local governments; and
    (c) individuals; and
    (9) the compliance cost for affected persons.
Enacted by Chapter 282, 1993 General Session